Birmingham’s Conservation Department cutbacks and closure still a threat

Birmingham City Council’s Conservation Department is facing considerable cutbacks and is under possible closure in the not so distant future.

The possible closure of the department and the definite closure of the department’s Conservation Group was prompted by its chairman, Chris Hargreaves, retirement and the need to cut £1.2 million from the Council’s planning department budget.

The fate of the department and its threat of disbandment were factored in during the Council’s annual budget reviews during February this year and isn’t the only department to under-go weighty cutbacks during these recession fueled times.

If the department were disbanded then the Council would be saving £350, 000, helping to contribute heavily towards the money needed to be saved to make a saving of £1.2 million.

The result would see the Conservation Department’s conservation officers put to work in the planning department meaning a major re-shuffle of staff and a loss of time for the highly trained people who would no longer be dealing with conservation issues.

The Council’s 1999 ‘Regeneration Through Conservation’ strategy is a document they still work from and use to outline their conservation work on their website.

The strategy’s main outline is:

‘To enrich the environment, define our local history and add uniqueness and interest in the face of homogenising impact of so much modern development.’

Then according to a ‘Conservation Strategy Review’ in 2004 the initial strategy was going well and significant changes in the city’s conservation and prioritization of specific conservation projects were going well.

The review even outlined the Birmingham Conservation Trust to have received £600, 000 in funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund in order to restore the ‘back to back’ houses found in Hurst Street.

Now cutbacks are being made and many conservation projects face never getting underway, with some current and ongoing projects like the regeneration happening in The Jewellery Quarter, not looking to be completed anytime soon.

Why the changes are being made

When contacted about why the decisions in cutbacks and possible closure were being made, Birmingham City Council’s Corporate Information Governance Team said:

‘Because of the economic recession there has been a fall in out planning application fee income which has, in turn, resulted in a reduction in the budget of the Planning Management Division.

As a consequence, a restructuring of the division is being undertaken, to reflect our reduced budget’.

The Governance Team confirmed that cost savings and the possible disbanding of the Conservation Department had indeed been discussed in February’s budget report but no decisions had been made on the outlined cutbacks or possible restructuring as of yet.

They added:

‘Restructuring relies on full consultation with staff and unions however we would intend to retain the necessary expertise to carry out the department’s statutory duties dealing with listed buildings, conservation area developments and protected trees.’

As to whether conservation officer’s expertises will be wasted if a restructure occurs is yet to be seen however the Council seem confident that they won’t.

To sign the online petition to save the Conservation Department click here

For a look at the department’s estimated yearly budget see the infographic below.

Did You Enjoy This Post?
Please consider giving us your vote

  • Delicious submit to delicious
  • Twitter Submit to twitter
  • Digg submit to digg
  • Stumble Upon submit to Stumble Upon

3 Comments So Far

  1. Thanks for this Rachael – and all the very useful background research. I don’t really understand what they mean by ‘possible disbanding’. The wording in the budget report (23 February, was pretty unambiguous, I thought. It said ‘disband’. The report was voted on and passed. Cllr Paula Smith, Chair of the Conservation and Heritage Panel abstained from the vote, and expressed her concerns in an interview in the Birmingham Post here http://xr.com/Disband. The full budget report is available on the internet. It is on a pdf and a bit fiddly to track down, but it should come up if the whole phrase here is Googled. (I such c & p back into Google)

    10 Feb 2010 … Planning Management service review. (Phase 2) – Disband Conservation

    Apr. 20 at 5:41 pm
  2. Further to my last, it seem that:

    “Although the Council’s budget report identified cost savings, including disbanding the Conservation team in Planning Management, no decisions have yet been made on cutbacks. Any decisions on restructuring would need to be subject to full consultation with staff and unions.” means what it says: the formal decision can’t be made until the statutory consultation with unions/staff has happened or they’ve all got unfair dismissal claims! In the meantime posts will not be filled and withering on the vine will occur. But the longer it takes the more overspent they’ll be this year (paying people they’ve no budget for) and the bigger the cuts will have to be NEXT year!!!

    Apr. 21 at 4:25 pm
  3. Hi Julia,

    Thanks for all the feedback on here and via email too, it’s much appreciated.Nice to see someone else is just as curious as I am.

    Thank you for the info on how I should be able to find the budget report, hopefully it’ll have some figures in it I can use for an infographic and an easy way to break down what’s being spent and where. I have also asked them for previous years budgets as a comparison but I don’t know how far i’ll get….

    I suppose what they meant by possible disbanding is like you say the longer it takes them to make a decision the more money they’ll spend meaning cutbacks will be bigger – getting rid of the department might be a drastic option but save them more money in the long run? No one seems to be very clear on the whole subject matter and their responses aren’t great but at least for now they’re something I suppose.

    The plot thickens so it would seem.

    Apr. 21 at 5:02 pm

Leave a Reply




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>